Abstract
There is increasing interest in using LLMs as decision-making “agents.” Doing so includes many degrees of freedom which model should be used; how should it be prompted; should it be asked to introspect, conduct chain-of-thought reasoning, etc? Settling these questions – and more broadly, determining whether an LLM agent is reliable enough to be trusted – requires a methodology for assessing such an agent’s economic rationality. In this paper, we provide one. We begin by surveying the economic literature on rational decision making, taxonomizing a large set of fine-grained “elements” that an agent should exhibit, along with dependencies between them. We then propose a benchmark distribution that quantitatively scores an LLMs performance on these elements and, combined with a user-provided rubric, produces a “rationality report card.” Finally, we describe the results of a large-scale empirical experiment with 14 different LLMs, characterizing the both current state of the art and the impact of different model sizes on models’ ability to exhibit rational behavior.
Samuel Joseph Amouyal
PhD candidate @ TAU, Research scientist @ Blinq.io
I am a PhD candidate in computer science interested in the intersection between Natural Language Processing (NLP) and other fields (psycholinguistics, economy, game-theory, literature …)